What Women Want (2000) doesn't live up to its title, but it's a helluva entertaining watch. This is my favorite Nancy Meyers fl...



What Women Want (2000) doesn't live up to its title, but it's a helluva entertaining watch. This is my favorite Nancy Meyers flick, the second being The Intern (2015).


The plot follows Nick Marshall (Mel Gibson), a chauvinistic executive who after a freak accident, attains the power to read women's minds. This especially comes in handy when his new boss is a woman embodied brilliantly by Helen Hunt.

Acting is the best factor with Gibson and Hunt sharing undeniable chemistry, even before they realize it in the frames. The supporting cast of Alan Alda, Marisa Tomei and Ashley Johnson make for an intriguing addition.

The movie succeeds in being a one-of-a-kind rom-com. It's equally romantic as it is comic. The complete 2 hours are fun. And even though the title is biased, it still has plenty to offer for both genders.

One negative part was how it took the venture a little too long to build up. The introductory half hour is slow. But after this period there are a ton of laughs. When Nick gets his ability it's all downhill from there.

Nick's final speech is unforgettable. Mel Gibson has totally outdone himself with this portrayal. He's both handsome and charming - qualities modern cinematic Casanovas lack!

In the end, What Women Want doesn't necessarily answer that question for us men, but it gives us a unique outlook on what both sexes want. And it's one of the best romantic comedies out there.

The Rating: 3.5 out of 4. 

If you like romance with depth, then check out Masoom Poetry:




It's a collection of 50 romantic poems, that after reading, makes you want to fall in love again. Whether it be on the topic of heartbreak or a newly-found love, this poetry e-book is the epitome of love lost or found again. 

The Trust (2016) is a heavily-clichéd crime film which does little to stand out from its low-budget contemporaries. The Plot: It fo...



The Trust (2016) is a heavily-clichéd crime film which does little to stand out from its low-budget contemporaries.

The Plot: It follows two cops who, while investigating a drug invasion, stumble upon unknown territory. 


The Good and The Bad: Honestly, one of the primary reasons I watched this is that I still hold Nicolas Cage in high regard as an actor. And he did not disappoint in that aspect. We don't have a prominent supporting cast here, so The Trust relies on Cage and Elijah Wood to carry the weight of the stereotypical script.

The initial 40 minutes are the highlight of this venture. This is due to the superb introduction of the lead stars. It's clear from the onset that both these individuals couldn't be any more distinct. And the humorous emphasis on this only makes it more fun to watch, if only the remaining 50 minutes were as equally entertaining.

The Trust suffers from being too typical. Trust me, the comedy implemented in the foremost half did succeed in giving this venture a lighter tone. But afterwards, when the mood becomes dark, The Trust loses its only glimmer of hope, and that was being unique from others in its genre.

Acting-wise, Cage and Wood made a surprisingly awesome team. Their different takes on the characters really did complement their on-screen friendship. So, this exhibition came as even more of a disappointment to see thespians who are not the most talked-about performers worldwide, who gave it their all for a lost cause.

Another negative factor was the monotony. You can guess the conclusion after one hour has passed. Although, I have to mention I was shocked that The Brewer Brothers' direction did allow for unpredictability, but again only for the opening 40 minutes.

The Verdict: The Trust starts off brilliantly and provides moments for Cage to show off his signature theatrics, but ultimately it fails in the third act. In my opinion, at a running time of approximately 90 minutes or more, this feature would have worked better as a short showcase.

The Rating: 1.5 out of 4. 

If you prefer thrillers, albeit, better ones than the afore-mentioned movie, then check out Masoom Thrillers #2:




It contains seven short-stories incorporating genres of vampire fiction to traditional tales of suspense. 

Sometimes, there are movies that just can't be placed in a single category, and The Nice Guys (2016) is definitely one of them. Ind...



Sometimes, there are movies that just can't be placed in a single category, and The Nice Guys (2016) is definitely one of them. Indeed, it's a rarity in these annual churn outs of Hollywood comedies.

The Plot: Two detectives must investigate the apparent suicide of a 1970s pornstar. 


 The Good: Have to give credit to Shane Black's direction, and his co-written screenplay with Anthony Bagarozzi. From the onset to the ending, it's one hell of  thriller and the pacing is definitely to die for. The cinematography is of an equally impeccable taste, and DOP Philippe Rousselot really did his best at lighting the sets throughout the duration.

Of course, the foremost aspect of this feature are the leads: Russell Crowe and Ryan Gosling. Crowe is brilliant as the tough guy, and Gosling literally surprised me by portraying a PI with less confidence as opposed to playing a totally different personality in 2015's The Big Short.

The Nice Guys constantly reminded me of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005) which Black also directed and wrote. KKBB is one of my favorite black comedies, and after so many years has another venture managed to surpass that cinematic flair.

This feature relies utmost on characterization over dramatization. We have no sentimental flashback sequences of our dynamic duo, and that I thought made the script quite distinct from other comedy thrillers, as in not making our heroes emotional but rather more motivational. And the slapstick devices used to move the plot forward are quite reminiscent of the Lethal Weapon quadrilogy, so it comes as no surprise that Black wrote the first part.

The Bad: However, The Nice Guys is not without its flaws. After the initial hour and a half of a 116 minutes running times, it seemed the final sequences seemed more forced than voluntarily written. Also, Angourie Rice's individual Holly is occasionally quite annoying, and the exhibition would've done better by allotting her lesser time on the screen.

The Verdict: The Nice Guys might not be to everyone's taste due to its slight explicitness, but it strays from the pack by being a lone wolf in a genre that demands additional showcases of such exclusive quality.

The Rating: 3 out of 4.

If you enjoy suspense, then Masoom Thrillers #2 is for you:

It contains seven short-stories incorporating genres of  vampire fiction to traditional tales of suspense.

Teen, stylized as Te3n, and in the English language, Three , is perhaps the finest Bollywood thriller of 2016, so far. The Plot: Ba...



Teen, stylized as Te3n, and in the English language, Three, is perhaps the finest Bollywood thriller of 2016, so far.

The Plot: Based on the 2013 South Korean film Montage, it depicts the pain and struggle a grandfather (Amitabh Bachhan) must go through to find out what happened to his daughter, in a kidnapping event set eight years prior to the current events.



The Good and The Bad: The cinematography is the foremost aspect of this feature. I really loved the lighting applied to both the present-timed shots and those of the flashbacks. I thought the bluish tone of the flashbacks were brilliant and really added depth to the narrative.

The narrative is finely penned. But it's relevant from the first half onwards that it took three screenwriters to scribe the script. This is because even though the plot is carried  cleverly through dialogues by our main character John and his interaction with detective-turned-priest Martin (Nawazuddin Siddiqui), there are times at which the present timeline becomes boring and the past footage is more fun to view.

Acting is the second-best feature of this flick. Amitabh Bachhan steals the show with an Oscar-worthy performance. The irony is that despite us having Siddiqui and Vidya Balan, performers of such high caliber, they are overshadowed by Mr. Bachhan's superior talent.

But don't let that be a blemish on the characterization implemented by the writing team. Every individual in the movie has their own allotted time in the spotlight, and both Siddiqui and Balan are given personas which they effortlessly make their own. Siddiqui is charismatic and I liked how it's shown why he gave up/got fired being a cop and transitioned to becoming a priest. And Balan, who has already cemented her position in B-Town as one of its greatest actresses, is equally impressive as Siddiqui in this exhibition.

Furthermore, from the onset to the ending, Mr. Bachhan not only showed his versatility from being a classic Bollywood heartthrob, to a 70-year old grandfather (and yes, he's 73 in real life), but he made Te3n the epitome of a character-driven shocker. This proves that Bollywood like Hollywood, that still relies on oldies like Samuel L. Jackson and Clint Eastwood to provide quality entertainment, also gives space to its legends to prove they have no limit to their on-screen showmanship.

Te3n is stronger after its interval of one hour and a few minutes has passed. It takes about 30-40 minutes to actually build up tension. I understand that it's an emotional thriller, but it the start should've been better with a swifter pace.  

Pacing is the greatest upset of Te3n. Only after the interval does everything (the writing, direction and acting) create such a colossal impact for the viewer,  that it came out as an explosion of cinematic genius. That's why I commend the superb direction by Ribhu Dasgupta and hope that he makes more films with such finesse.

The Verdict: If you're more into higher budgeted ventures, then Te3n might not be for you, but if you want compelling storytelling with an extremely gratifying ending, then this movie is certainly a must-watch, especially for the enthusiasts of dramatic suspense.

Rating: 3 out of 4. 

If you enjoy thrillers, please do check out Masoom Thrillers #1:

 

A collection of five short-stories guaranteed to chill your spine. Henna tells the tale of an ancient ritual gone wrong. Witness Protection deals with an FBI agent visiting a creepy village. Ghosts of Iraq is about four US soldiers haunted by a ghost in Iraq. Red Carpet is about two teenagers who discover something sinister at a high-end nightclub.
 

After the ill-fated release of Batman vs. Superman, DC has been controversial in hyping up movies then not living up to their own poten...



After the ill-fated release of Batman vs. Superman, DC has been controversial in hyping up movies then not living up to their own potential. Suicide Squad (2016) is an even more riskier project because of its relatively lesser known characters than the afore-mentioned blockbuster. Spoilers ahead.

The Plot: After the events of BvS, intelligence operative Amanda Waller (Viola Davis) assembles Task Force X, a group containing one of the most dangerous criminals in the DCU.



The Good: David Ayer's direction was top-notch. He really showcased each and every character well in the running time of 123 minutes. In my opinion, Will Smith really stood out from among the rest of the cast, and that's due to his charisma in such roles. I loved his performance in Hancock (2008) and he showcases his caliber in playing another anti-hero.

I know most of my friends who are reading this would wonder when I would mention Margot Robbie's portrayal of Harley Quinn. And so here you have it: She was a doll. Not only was she wonderful to look at but she acted quite well. Jared Leto's theatrics as The Joker are in no way to be ignored, and despite being in the picture for a lesser screentime, he did play his part to the fullest.

I think it's unfair to compare Leto's Joker with Heath Ledger. I mean Ledger did do immaculate justice to the role but Leto gave his own stellar persona to the world's most infamous villain. And I applaud Suicide Squad on being a movie where The Joker was shown less but had as much as impact as he could in the feature.

I also liked the comic parts which really helped move the story along. And this is where Smith's Deadshot and Robbie's Quinn really outdid themselves by having a strange on-screen chemistry, the same way they did in the movie Focus (2015). They complemented each other well as much as Quinn and Joker did in this venture.

Cinematography-wise, the film is really lit up well. Although, it does seem majority of the flick was shot in a way to induce epilepsy, the overall look of the exhibition had style, and SS has emphasis on style. The action sequences are truly adrenaline-pumping especially those featuring Deadshot and Quinn. Not every SS member is given an ample amount of screen-time but the direction of the action scenes incorporating them were superbly shot. Even though members like Katana and Killer Croc seem under-used they did add a great deal of versatility towards the end. It's sad how Slipknot had so little screentime though.

Another positive factor I noticed is that the movie gets better as much as it progress. This is largely due to the start being poorly made, but as the pace moves along we get to broaden our horizons, that this is a team of anti-heroes. And that's where the uniqueness of SS lies.
The bar scene was also enthralling. Despite some mediocre storytelling in between sequences, the footage of such fiends being shown together at one place, and the righteous Rick Flag (Joel Kinnaman) taking a seat next to them is simply brilliant. The story of Diablo's past really hit us in the head that why this individual is so afraid of his powers. But if this sequence was shown at an earlier period, then it might've been better, as there's a dissatisfaction when this realization has been reached.

The Bad: From onset to the ending, there is one continuous error, and that is the central storyline. Not only is it average but the follow-through by screenwriter Ayer rendered it a confusing mess. In the end, we'll just be dying to guess what majority of the team's motives were.

And I mean the only one truly crazy in the group was Harley Quinn. Deadshot was a father so his reason for staying does mean he has a stronger moral compass than the rest of the group. But the characters aren't all that interesting. Although, the actors and actresses are not to blame as they gave their all in the depictions.

But the worst character was that of Enchantress played by Cara Delevingne. I'm not sure what turned me off here, it was either the character was poorly designed or just that the actress didn't suit the role. When you reach the movie's third act, the CGI effects are so poorly enchanted on Enchantress that you'd wonder whether employing Smith and Robbie was worth the cost of such bad quality visuals. The effects of the third act also made me wonder whether this was comedy-action or action-comedy.

For a film that boasts on action, the ending was supremely anti-climatic. You still have to love that part where four SS members see their wildest fantasies coming true and Diablo (Jay Hernandez) tells them that it's not real. This part was the strongest sequence of Suicide Squad, and only if the entire duration had this much depth, the narrative would've justified the screenplay.

The Verdict: Suicide Squad lives up to its title by showcasing a group that has nothing to lose ethically. It might not be the best-written comic-book adaptation, it's a stronger viewing after the initial half has passed, and the ending might not be justifiable to the plot, but it was still satisfactory in terms of what you see is what you get.

Rating: 2.5 out of 4.