When you have a movie fictionally based on a real-life documentary, things start getting complicated, and that was the primary issue I ...



When you have a movie fictionally based on a real-life documentary, things start getting complicated, and that was the primary issue I faced while watching Our Brand Is Crisis (2015).

The Plot: Based on the 2005 documentary of the same name, the film deals with a retired American political consultant, and how she must take part in another election, helping a Bolivian presidential candidate this time around. 



The Good and The Bad: Sandra Bullock plays the main character the best way she can. She's no Miss Congeniality here but she tries to put magic into a script with nothing much to offer. We have talented actors like Billy Bob Thornton, Anthony Mackie, Scoot McNairy and Joaquim de Almeida, with director David Gordon Green (Pineapple Express, Joe) giving them all enough screen-time to succeed.

But the problem always lies in this form of political satire. It just isn't for everyone. The comic parts of Our Brand Is Crisis are worth a laugh or two but if a viewer used word-of-mouth to spread them, they won't even come across as half-funny.

The script by Peter Straughan showcased his flair for funny dialogue as with 2009's The Men Who Stare at Goats, but here the humor does nothing but move along the running time of 107 minutes as swiftly as possible.

Bullock's character Jane Bodine AKA Calamity Jane is fun to watch, and her personality is dramatized well, but the viewer can't relate with what she wants. I liked how the love-hate relationship with Thornton's character Pat Candy, who is on the opposing team, was depicted throughout the venture. Yet, these scenes are nothing but comic relief without any underlying strength.

The paramount sequences were those that Bullock shared with the main presidential candidate Pedro Castillo, played exceptionally well by Almeida, and how these two individuals did or did not get along in the feature were the most entertaining parts, as they illustrated both humor and strength in the undertone of the screenplay.

Despite the first and second acts being written poorly, the third act really redeemed the picture, yet veterans of watching this genre, or most comedies, would have guessed that the emotional impact would have definitely been in the conclusion.

And that is what really turns you off at some parts. Calamity Jane's tactics are just too predictable that they seem to make the overall cinematic experience taken for granted. If Our Brand Is Crisis was more about her overcoming her professional shortcomings in accordance with the major storyline, and not the continuous discourses with Pat Candy, then this might've been a outstanding flick.

The Verdict: In a way, Our Brand Is Crisis does live up to its title, by being a dilemma in its genre, and proving that Hollywood needs to churn out better satirical takes on politics in the near future.

Rating: 2 out of 4.

The following review of Point Break (2015) contains spoilers. Plot and Analysis: When you make a remake of a 1991's cult cl...



The following review of Point Break (2015) contains spoilers.

Plot and Analysis: When you make a remake of a 1991's cult classic of the same name, you couldn't fall any lower than this. We have two actors trying their best to bring out the magic of Keanu Reeves and Patrick Swayze who starred in the original, but just like the ultimate challenge at the end of the feature, they both ultimately fail.

 

Okay, so the start is just like the last two Fast and Furious franchise movies. We have a dashing blonde hero Johnny Utah (Luke Bracey) who surprisingly does manage to at least sound like Reeves in the original venture. After an extreme sports disaster which leads to his close friend dying, Mr. Utah  enlists in the FBI where he meets the typical boss played to the utmost cynicism by Delroy Lindo.

And then Utah all of a sudden gets a super boost in his IQ level by finding out that a series of robin-hood-esque robberies around the world are being committed by the same group, as if the long line of FBI personnel in the office he is advising couldn't have guessed this.

We then have Utah going to France to search for this group, he sees a party happening on a ship in a popular sea and when he also gets to surf again, he gets hit by a strong wave, and then rescued by, wait for it, the antagonist of this feature: Bodhi played adequately by Edgar Ramirez. I would even go as further as saying that his character is the only likeable one in Point Break. 

Thereon, you have the hero falling for the rebellious Samsara (Teresa Palmer) whose only interesting feature is that her name is unique but Palmer herself acted like she regretted getting the part. Then you have so much predictability in the first hour itself that it's extremely difficult to go through the almost 2-hour length of this lackluster disaster.

The Good: The cinematography and the overall mise-en-scene were enthralling and breath-taking to look at. Director and cinematographer Ericson Core was also the DOP for 2001's The Fast and the Furious and he really pays more homage to that film more than the foremost Point Break. But he also showcases that he can actually handle a budget of $105 million but Kurt Wimmer's awful script led to the movie only earning something above $133 million worldwide.

The Bad: The follow-through of the main plot, the acting (except by Ramirez) and truthfully the budget should've allowed for better actors. I mean if you're remaking Point Break, you can at least try to find convincing actors, especially of the rebellious group who managed to bore me so much, I can't even remember their names in the movie.

With Hollywood increasingly getting more chances at making high-budget ventures, they should remember that CGI might save a film from flopping (okay not in this case) but it still renders it a tedious experience to watch if it's not written well.

The Verdict: Point Break is the epitome that remakes of cult classics have to be produced rightfully or else the only task they achieve is the re-watching of the original masterpiece. The only breaking point with this reboot you'll find is in the ending, because all's well that ends well, even though this conclusion you'd be dying for after finishing the initial 60 minutes.

Rating: 1 out of 4.

Dear readers, I'm pleased to announce the release of my 1st self-published short-story collection: Masoom Thrillers #1. I would like t...

Dear readers,

I'm pleased to announce the release of my 1st self-published short-story collection: Masoom Thrillers #1. I would like to thank my friends, family and of course you, my dear readers, for making my self-publishing dream come true. You can check out the book here:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01HVFIYEA#nav-subnav

Thank you,
Nisar Masoom.

Avengers: Age of Ultron is a difficult movie to rate. With its predecessor being the almighty 2012's The Avengers, Age of Ultron had man...

Avengers: Age of Ultron is a difficult movie to rate. With its predecessor being the almighty 2012's The Avengers, Age of Ultron had many expectations to live up to. And thankfully, it has surpassed those set limits.


To start with, when we watched The Dark Knight Rises a few months after The Avengers, we declared that the latter is a childish flick. And that's true. But when Joss Whedon (one of my fav directors) decided to pen the first draft of the sequel's script in a bar after a few days of The Avengers' release, we fans knew that Age of Ultron would be worth looking forward to because Whedon is not only a creative director but a visionary artist.

Age of Ultron's strongest point is the face-off between Ultron and Iron Man. Ultron is a force similar to Tony Stark's intellect ('cause Stark created it, duh!). So, you can say that the egomaniacal side of Stark is reflected on to Ultron. And that creates a phenomenon (like in Marvel's Daredevil) of the good vs evil triumph. Also, James Spader was the best choice to voice the villain due to his dialogue delivery in The Blacklist.

Another positive point is that the long sequence at the onset of the blockbuster is superb. And enthralls viewers that if action in the start is awesome, then the final battle will be the epitome of awesome. Plus, the Iron Man vs Hulk fight is incomparable to any other CGI fight scene (let's see what Snyder does with Superman vs Batman).

Now, for the negatives: One, the the movie often seems slow, too slow. The Avengers had better humor so we were able to pass the lagging scenes. But here, you feel that you can doze through at least twenty minutes of the film.

Secondly, the story sometimes becomes too complex. Not that we adults can't comprehend it but maybe younger audiences should be allowed more bite than bark. And a minority of the shots seemed like they were just made to showcase the use of CGI rather actually do something. Godzilla is a prime example of CGI over story but Avengers 2 has much plot than SFX.

To end with, Avengers: Age of Ultron is a must-watch for comic-book fans. For the people who want Nolanesque brilliance, look elsewhere, but do give this movie a gambling chance.

3 out of 4.

Check out my third short film: Gone Game Leave your reviews in the comments section below. Thanks in advance.

Check out my third short film:

Leave your reviews in the comments section below.

Thanks in advance.

Dukhtar (Daughter) is an epitome of parallel cinema. Unfortunately, it does not go beyond the boundaries with its message. The storyli...

Dukhtar (Daughter) is an epitome of parallel cinema. Unfortunately, it does not go beyond the boundaries with its message.



The storyline follows a mother (Samiya Mumtaz) and her ten-year-old daughter (Saleha Aref), who escape their home in order to restrict the girl from an arranged marriage to an elderly tribal leader.

Filled with brilliant cinematography highlighting the picturesque mountains and valleys of Northern Pakistan, Dukhtar is a gem of theatrical beauty. The cast is superb with the foremast performance by lead actress Mumtaz, with strong support from Mohib Mirza (the truck driver) and Aref who played the titular character.

The movie does have stunning direction. With more than enough artistically shot scenes. But the writing power is limited. Only some of the dialogues are worth applause, and the entire movie relies on Mumtaz to push it forward.

Another negative factor is the predictability. The is one of the most foreseeable dramas I have watched. Furthermore, the screenplay confuses the viewer into where the plot is leading them. Is it a dramatic thriller? Is it an adventure? This flick should have used a particular genre. And by trying to be multi-layered it sort of failed in this venture.

Yet, it is still one of the best non-commercial features of 2014. And I want to congratulate writer/director Afia Nathaniel in showing the world that Pakistani motion-pictures are no joke. And also for her debut being selected as an official entry in the Best Foreign Language Film category for the 87th Academy Awards.

IMDb: 7.3/10.
Rotten Tomatoes: N/A.
BO101: 3 out of 4.

My third official short film. Shot on location in Al Ain, the United Arab Emirates. It is the sequel to Passing the Driving Test Plot: The...

My third official short film. Shot on location in Al Ain, the United Arab Emirates. It is the sequel to Passing the Driving Test

Plot: The Brother (Hassan Faheem) finally gets his license. Now, Ali wants a try at the test, much to the dismay of The Instructor.

Dear friends, this movie is for you to review, in the comments section below.

Also, be sure to like my production crew's page on FaceBook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Three-Musketeers-production/707407262708541?fref=photo.

Thanks for watching! (in advance).

Passing the Driving Test 2:

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=717644331684834&set=vb.707407262708541&type=2&theater.